StackScape
Home/Code/Continue vs Sourcegraph Cody
Code Comparison · 2026

Continue vs Sourcegraph Cody

Which is better in 2026? We compare Continue and Sourcegraph Cody side by side — pricing, features, pros & cons — so you can choose the right Code tool.

C

Continue

★4.3

Open-source AI code assistant that lets you connect any LLM to VS Code or JetBrains.

PricingFree
CategoryCode
Rating4.3/5
Visit Continue →Full profileContinue alternatives →
S

Sourcegraph Cody

★4.3

AI coding assistant that understands your entire codebase for context-aware completions and answers.

PricingFreemium
CategoryCode
Rating4.3/5
Visit Sourcegraph Cody →Full profileSourcegraph Cody alternatives →

Feature Comparison

FeatureContinueSourcegraph Cody
Bring your own model✓—
Tab autocomplete✓—
Chat with codebase✓—
Custom slash commands✓—
Full codebase context—✓
Multi-repo understanding—✓
Autocomplete—✓
Chat with code—✓

Pricing Comparison

Continue

Free

Completely free to use with no paid tiers.

View pricing →

Sourcegraph Cody

Freemium

Free tier available. Paid plans unlock additional features.

View pricing →

Pros & Cons

Continue

👍 Pros

  • +Fully open-source
  • +Use any model provider
  • +Highly customizable

👎 Cons

  • −Requires self-configuration
  • −No hosted option for non-technical users
  • −Documentation could be better

Sourcegraph Cody

👍 Pros

  • +Deep codebase awareness
  • +Works with large monorepos
  • +Multiple LLM choices

👎 Cons

  • −Setup can be complex for enterprise
  • −Free tier has usage limits
  • −Indexing large repos takes time

Users also compared

C
vs
C

Continue vs Cursor

Code

C
vs
O

Continue vs Ollama

Code

C
vs
G

Continue vs GitHub Copilot

Code

C
vs
A

Continue vs Anthropic API

Code

Get the best new AI tools in your inbox every week

Join thousands of developers, designers, and creators who discover new AI tools every week. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.